GRADE 12 LEARNERS POOR DISCIPLINE DURING ECONOMICS PERIOD IN LEPHOLA HIGH SCHOOL
Poor learners discipline is always a key issue to address for effective teaching and learning to take place in a classroom. This is my first year as economics teacher at Lephola High,however my first experience have turned out to be a disaster for me since I couldn’t manage the classes well because of learners poor discipline in a class that led into ineffective teaching and learning. Learners always misbehaved in different ways that drained my energy and teaching time. I decided to take a more proactive approach i.e. making changes to improve something before problems happen, rather than reacting to problems and then changing things.
1.3 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Learners misbehaviours such as disruptive talking, persistent avoidance of work, interfering with teaching instructionsand activities, harassing classmates, verbal insults, rudeness to teacher, ranging from rare to frequent, moderate to severe, is a thorny difficulty in daily classroom activities. Educators oftencomplain about learner’s misbehaviour in the classroom and they had to spend a wonderful deal of time and strength to control the classroom. Obviously, learner’s misbehaviours reduces the smoothness and effectiveness of quality teaching, and also deprive learner from their learning opportunities. Moreover, lookup findings have proven that school misbehaviour not only escalated with time but also diminished educational fulfilment and elevated delinquent conduct (Wheldall and Merrett 2011). To lessen these on the spot and gradual adverse consequences of learner’s misbehaviour, it is importantly to identify what exactly are these internal classroom misbehaviours.
In the literature, exceptional phrases have been used to describe troublesome behaviours of learners. For instance, (Stewart 2010) referred to learner’smisconduct as disciplinary violations in school, for instance, tardiness, vandalism, fighting, stealing, and drinking at school. When there are clear guidelines and regulations in school and classroom, violation of these is curiously a “misbehaviour or misconduct or self-discipline problem.” Nevertheless, a specific behaviour is viewed as problematic, and may also not always be rule breaking. For instance, daydreaming in class, not finishing homework, disrupting class, bullying, and rudeness to teachers are named as “problem behaviours, or “disruptive behaviours”. These behaviours referred to “an activity that causes distress for teachers, interrupts the mastering system and that leads educators to make persistent remarks to learners”, or “the myriad things to do which disrupt and impede the teaching-learning process”. Noting that faculty misconduct is one of the manifests of the problem behaviours syndrome, the term “problem behaviours” was used to refer to all externalizing behaviours that violate express guidelines or implicit norms, disturb the classroom order, and irritate the process of teaching and mastering in this study.
Several scales have been developed to measure teachers’ perceptions of school room problem behaviours. For instance, in the United Kingdom, (Wheldall and Merrett 2011) used ten items, such as eating, nonverbal noise, disobedience, idleness/slowness, unpunctuality, hindering others, physical aggression, untidiness, and out of seat, to measure conduct issues among essential school students. (Houghton 2010) also used these behaviours to measure secondary school learners’ conduct problems.
Rights and responsibilities: Learners’ rights are entrenched among the Bill of Rights, The study on Education, the Children’s Bill of Rights (Sonn:2013). With these rights go responsibilities. At the beginning of this scientific research every collaborating professional person asked the learners what their rights were. When a discussion of those rights, the learners listed the responsibilities that associate with every right. Let’s say, if learners have the correct to education, they even have the responsibility to confirm that alternative learners receive education. The professional person stressed the actual fact that the professional person conjointlyhas rights and responsibilities and therefore the learners ought to embody them in their discussion. The issue of rights and responsibilities offer a useful focus because:
• It permits expectations of behaviour to be connected to the values of the college that successively outline the attribute of the college.
• It permits the behaviour policy and therefore the syllabus to become interlinked at the room level.
• It provides a basis for learner involvement.
• It permits for a system of rules or expectations that has logical coherence.
Educators ought to perceive that complete freedom of alternative isn’t useful to learners (Galvin, 2010). Total freedom isn’t fascinating for developing adolescents, and therefore the professional person ought to strike a balance between permitting total freedom and giving a guiding hand to the learners.